Check Congress

Bill · 119th Congress

H.R. 6048

NDO Fairness Act of 2025

Passed HouseIntroduced Nov 17, 2025Topic: Crime and Law Enforcement →
  1. 01 Introduced
  2. 02 Committee
  3. 03 Passed House
  4. 04 Passed Senate
  5. 05 To President
  6. 06 Law

Latest action · Sep 14, 2026
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

What this bill does

NDO Fairness Act
 
This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).

The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.

This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.

The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Congressional Research Service · Introduced in House · Nov 17, 2025

How Congress voted

No recorded votes yet. Many bills pass by voice vote or unanimous consent, where no one's individual vote is written down.

Timeline

  1. Sep 14, 2026Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. Aug 31, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. Aug 31, 2026On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267)
  4. Aug 31, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
  5. Aug 31, 2026DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048.
  6. Aug 31, 2026Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268)
  7. Aug 31, 2026Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  8. Nov 20, 2025Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
  9. Nov 20, 2025Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  10. Nov 18, 2025Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  11. Nov 17, 2025Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  12. Nov 17, 2025Introduced in House

Cosponsors

1 member

Details

Cost estimates · Congressional Budget Office

None published

Subject tags · 9

Business recordsComputers and information technologyCongressional oversightConsumer affairsCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationInternet, web applications, social mediaJudicial procedure and administrationRight of privacyTelephone and wireless communication